What distinguishes subjective evidence from objective evidence in bookkeeping?

Subjective evidence in bookkeeping is characterized by its reliance on personal opinions, interpretations, or beliefs rather than solid facts or data. This type of evidence can vary from person to person based on their experiences, feelings, or perspectives. For example, if a bookkeeper assesses the value of an asset based on personal judgment or market sentiment, that assessment is considered subjective.

In contrast, objective evidence is rooted in factual, measurable data that can be independently verified. It typically includes financial records, invoices, receipts, and other tangible documentation. Objective evidence helps ensure that bookkeeping practices maintain consistent standards and transparency, as it does not rely on individual feelings or opinions.

The distinction is essential for maintaining accuracy and reliability in financial reporting, as subjective judgments may not reflect the true state of financial affairs. This understanding aids in developing a more sound approach to bookkeeping that emphasizes verifiable information.